AI的智能定义自身存在悖论，其核心是AI自主性是“他者”。从文明的属性角度，自主性只属于人类。因此，在哲学领域，真理和缪误之间将出现一个需要厘清的中间本体，即AI自主性。

The definition of AI's intelligence itself has a paradox, and its core is that AI autonomy is the 'other'. From the perspective of the attributes of civilization, autonomy belongs only to humans. Therefore, in the field of philosophy, there will be an intermediate ontology between truth and error, namely AI autonomy.

当代社会，绝大多数自然人的成长，心灵都是从感性向理性成长、成熟。用理性谋生者多。感性则跟随每一个自然人的一生。感性是每一个自然人的心灵负担，也是人类高贵之处。

In contemporary society, the vast majority of natural people grow and mature from emotions to rationality. There are many people who make a living through rationality. Sensibility follows every natural person throughout their lifetime. Sensibility is the spiritual burden of every natural person and also the nobility of humanity.

人工智能，迄今则只是一系列形式逻辑算法组合的应用平台。你可以说它只有“理性”。人工智能的“感性”何时可以产生？这不是技术路径问题，只可能取决于你如何定义甚至修改“感性”的定义。这正是AI的智能自身的悖论的开始。

Artificial intelligence, so far, is only an application platform that combines a series of formal logic algorithms. You can say it only has' rationality '. When can the "sensibility" of artificial intelligence be generated? This is not a technical path issue, it may only depend on how you define or even modify the definition of 'sensibility'. This is precisely the beginning of the paradox of AI's intelligence itself.

文明人类世界的本质性颠覆，将会从人类自我构想的AI自主性、自我认同的AI自主性开始，走向真理与缪误、是与非、现实与虚幻的全面混沌和异化。

The fundamental subversion of the civilized human world will begin with human self conception of AI autonomy and self-identity of AI autonomy, and move towards a comprehensive chaos and alienation of truth and falsehood, right and wrong, reality and illusion.